Thursday, July 07, 2005

Aggression or Appeasement

Ok, I know it's about time, but today's events needs commenting. I was reading in some comments. I don't think there has been a subject that received so many comments in that amount of time, so people are really heated up about this. One caught my eye and I couldn't let it go, I had to respond. Here is my post to it:

Ok, it's late and I see this has received many comments,
I don't have time to scroll through them all, but one got my attention:

Posted by: boberin at July 7, 2005 08:28 AM
I'm betting that if we kill a bunch more of them that they will finally see the light and realize what a loving bunch we are. Just a few more should do it, maybe more than a few but what's the difference? We'll kill all it takes to make them feel loved. Then all will be right with the world.

Ok, so we don't fight them. Appeasement looks like an only alternative. Let's look how that has worked out. England, WWII, tried it and almost bombed to smitherings. France, same war, thought they could be a friend, and got ran over, and we had to save their ungrateful behinds.
So how do you think that will work out.
Then again, let's look at how non-appeasment has worked out. United States, when bombed by Japan, we were very aggressive, and thank goodness, we do not live in an Eastern Empirical dictatorship. When our allies needed our help, we met agression with our own agression, and now, Europe (at that time, and I know they are doing their best to screw that up) is free.
So, what road works out here. Do the history, do the math, think about it!!
Kirk out!!
Posted by kwl at July 8, 2005 12:24 AM

What are your thoughts? Let if flow!!


Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

12:14 AM  
Blogger kwl said...

OK, I am going to let this stand for a day or two, just to show that there is no argument to my post. Also, I am going to restrict anonymous postings, so these intelligent beings can get credit for their brilliant additions to this blog.
The only reason to delete, and I will in a few hours, is to rid it of the 'F' bomb, that so truely pointed out his real intelligence.

6:53 AM  
Blogger kwl said...

On second thought, I cannot let the 'F' word stay in this post. My family reads this. So let me paraphrase, just in case someone needs to get some enlightenment out of his great retorical post, he/she (maybe it) said;
"You're a F*$#+ing idiot."

Brilliant huh?

6:56 AM  
Blogger camojack said...

Well...the deleted comment was pithy, at least.
(Or just pi$$y?)

9:40 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home